-
logo

Home | CAPS News | Prison Works? | Prison News | Companies Lists | Prisons Lists | Prison Texts | Contact Us

 CAPS News Older Posts

NEW SPS UPDATE

The latest news coming out of the Scottish Prison Service is that the release of the Industries review has been delayed yet again. Apparently it has been decided that "further work was necessary, to provide the level of detail appropriate, to make informed decisions on what activities that prisoners should engage in to help with the aim of reducing recidivism" according to a Freedom of Information request. "This work was allocated to a senior manager in June 2009 and is now ongoing. As a result of the level of detail being analysed as part of this task, it is unlikely that it will concluded until 2010. [18/08/09]

FINE CELL WORK

In the Independent on Sunday 16 Aug there was an article about Anne Tree and the Fine Cell Work charity she set up entitled 'They all got the needle with me' (also on-line under the slightly more comprehensible title 'Meet the aristocrat who's got prisoners in stitches'). Fine Cell Work, for those who have not come across it before in the pages of the Sunday colour supplements or who have not seen its products in the V&A or heard about its commissioning to recreate tapestries for the newly refurbished Dover Castle, is "a social enterprise that teaches needlework to prison inmates and sells their products", to quote their website.

Ms. Tree herself is the daughter of the 10th Duke of Devonshire and freely refers to herself as "a Victorian do-gooder who had a calling to help people in prison who weren't being helped otherwise." In her time she has been a prison visitor, deputy entertainments officer at Wandsworth Prison and introduced ex-Labour Cabinet minister Lord Longford to Myra Hindley.

Her plan for Fine Cell Work was "to provide prisoners with "real" work to do while in jail that would pay them enough to provide a small nest egg to ease their re-entry into society on release." A laudable sentiment you would say. However, some would say the reality is slightly different.

The article claims that the charity "employs 350 inmates in 26 prisons ... each earning up to £500 a year making intricate, high-quality cushion covers and rugs." Sounds good, but the Fine Cell Work website, which displays prisoner-made cushions for sale at £50-£195 and patchwork quits costing up to £1200, claims that the 403 prisoners it employed in 2008 earned £61,890. A swift calculation using those figures gives an average of £153 each that year or less than £3 for the 20 hours work a week the average prisoner works.

The fact that the work is done by prisoners banged-up in their cells on their own time should mean that what they earn is extra to their IEP wages and might lead to the prisoners accruing a "small nest egg" over the average 3 years they work for the charity. Yet, a wage rate of 15p an hour is not particularly good, even by prison standards.

That is not to say that Fine Cell Work does not also give an opportunity for prisoners, 80% of whom are men, to learn new skills and many Fine Cell Work alumini testify to benefits like increased self-confidence and self-worth. And we certainly need more social enterprises to be established in UK prisons to help create some meaningful work opportunities for prisoners whose opportunities are often limited to cleaning, laundry and kitchen work or some mind-numbing low-skill high-tedium Contract Services job. Unfortunately the only notable examples of prison-based social enterprises have been the defunct Barbed design studio at HMP Coldingley, The Clink restaurant at HMP High Down and the market gardening Community Interest Company at HMP Erlestoke.

Yet we really need projects that prisoners can become actively involved in the day-to-day running of as well as gaining real skills and financial benefit from, rather than serving food to people in a restaurant that you are unable to eat in and from which you gain no financial benefit other that normal prison wages, as happens at The Clink. To that end the Community Interest Company model as used at Erlestoke is much the preferable because of the real involvement of the prisoners themselves in running the enterprise rather than it just being paid lip service by the Prison Service. [18/08/09]

TRAINING PRISON FAILS TO TRAIN

HMP & YOI Parc, a Category B local training prison run by G4S, has been criticised by the HM Inspector of Prisons, following an unannounced inspection, for failing to carry out its role as a training prison. The official report said there were only 70 education and 289 work places for 1,200 male prisoners at the private jail, resulting in the majority being banged up all day.

Anne Owers went even further and said, "Parc is Wales' only generic training prison and at present it is unequipped to perform that role. Welsh prisoners therefore either need to leave Wales, or to miss out on the education and training opportunities they need in order to increase their life chances outside prison."

This follows an announced inspection in January 2006 that found among others things that: "At the time of our visit 199 prisoners were unemployed. Although most prisoners were allocated to work places, for many there was in fact no work. On one morning of the inspection, only 6 out of the 69 prisoners in workshops were actually working. Some of the work was repetitive and tedious, and offered little skills training."

"The claim made to inspectors that this nevertheless instilled a ‘work ethic’ was scarcely credible. There was little work skills training, and the quality of education was poor – this was particularly unacceptable for the prison’s juvenile population."

There was also "insufficient work and skills training, and delivery of education, particularly to juveniles, was weak. Prisoners’ time out of cell met contractual arrangements, but was inaccurately recorded, and there was insufficient activity to occupy them." [Feb 2009]

ASSOCIATION OF PRISONERS STATEMENT

It has just been announced that Ben Gunn has taken over from John Hirst as the General Secretary of the Association of Prisoners (AoP). The AoP is an ad-hoc association of serving prisoners originally formed in 2000. After a period of inactivity, recent moves by a number of prisoners has seen its reemergence and the AoP has decided to take on the government over the issue of prisoners' voting rights. Along with the voting issue, Ben has also pledged to take on the issue of prison labour in the area of Contract Services. [Feb 2009]

AoP STATEMENT

BOOKER/DHL GUILTY OF AGE DISCRIMINATION?

Many prisoners are only now feeling the full force of the recent change in their prison canteen supplier. In the change-over period Aramark, as everyone expected, "ramped up their prices to a stupid level", to quote one prisoner, and Booker/DHL have followed suit.

On top of that, Booker/DHL have almost halved the list of items that were previously available, with a loss of some 350 items has been widely reported, many of them being particularly popular amongst the customer base. One item some of the older members of the prison population are particularly rankled about losing is their denture fixative! As the same prisoner said, this loss "has led to some mumbling. It would be screams but their teeth fell out..."

However, this is not a laughing matter, it is merely another illustration of the standard lack of consideration of prisoners' needs shown by canteen suppliers that they have long been resigned to.

SCOTTISH PRISON SERVICE INDUSTRIES REVIEW COMPLETED

We understand that the long mooted review of SPS Industries by Paula Arnold, ex-Deputy Head of Industries, has been completed and has been handed over to the SPS Board for consideration.

Amongst the items that we are told are covered is the fact that there is something like £400,000 of stock of SPS Industries' Athol garden furniture stock crammed into every available space at the Fauldhouse depot. It appears that whilst new stock has arrived, there has hardly been any stock leaving via sales and this has been the case well before the 'credit crunch' arrived. All this stock has been made at the Scottish tax payers' expense and some of it has been there for so long (we are told that a number of stock lines have not sold in years) that some of it is rotting. No wonder the annual income of the Industries department has plummeted in recent years [see] and, as we come to the end of the current financial year, this situation will again make a large dent in the Scottish Prison Service's annual returns

It also appears that the number is up for the very same Fauldhouse depot and its staff. The place is just too costly to remain a viable option, especially if we see the end of Industries as a whole.

As a reward for clutching the poisoned chalice of the review, with the inevitable task of recommending the redundancy of some of the people that she has worked with for years, Paula Arnold has just moved to the position of Operations Manager at HMP Glenochil despite her preferred option of Deputy Governor at HMP & YOI Corton Vale (more office politics we understand).

We await the publishing of the review with batted breath and can only hope that it will be the final nail in the coffin of SPS Industries and that Scottish prisoners will end up with proper training programs that will equip them with the sort of useful skills that will get them a decent job on the outside, rather than some McJob whilst being exploited for profit by SPS Industries and Contract Services. [Jan 2009]

Back

 

SPS INDUSTRIES UPDATE

The beginning of 2009 sees SPS Industries still in limbo with the only major Contract Services customer being Speedy Hire, who are using workshops at HMP Glenochil to refurbish motorway roadwork lights. The old Airsprung Beds workshops at HMP Shotts stand empty, all the tools and machinery having returned to Wiltshire.

Currently, the store space previously used to hold the Airsprung bedframes prior to transport south is now being used to store the rapidly increasing stock of Athol garden furniture. We are told that sales of this are so low at the moment, with some items having barely moved in recent years, that the Fauldhouse warehouse is "bursting at the seams". In fact, turnover is so slow at the moment that it hardly seems possible that it could cover the wages of all the Central Stores staff. [Jan 2009]

ARAMARK IS STILL AT IT

Following the takeover of canteen supplies in England and Wales by Booker & DHL announced at the end of last year, there are already complaints about the price rises revealed in their first canteen sheet recently issued to prisoners (see the January 2009 issue of Inside Time for one such letter entitled "Victims of a Monopoly").

It would also appear that the announcement of the DHL and Booker takeover itself was a little premature as we have learnt that Aramark continue to supply canteen goods in some parts of the country, such as Kent. Worse still from the prisoners' point of view is the announcement by Aramark, against the background of the massive price war that has broken out amongst the major supermarket chains, that they will also be increasing their prices this month (January 2009).

Amongst the items highlighted in the Inside Time letter were tins of tuna chunks up from 87p to £1.38. Aramark's equivalent rise is from 87p to £1.49, a 71% increase. Other Aramark price rises include Heinz tomato ketchup up from £1.49 to £2.19 (47%); 500g Pasta shells up from 59p to 99p (68%) and 1kg Basmati rise up from £2 to £3.89, a 95% increase!

The Prison Service claim that Aramark prices (and those of Booker/DHL) are regularly checked against High Street supermarkets such as Somerfields and Morrisons. However, visits to both of these supermarkets earlier this month found only 5 items that were more expensive than Aramark's 100 or so price-rise list items (we ignored all "special offers"). Most others were significantly more expensive, with essentials such as Colgate toothpaste more than 20% higher. Could it be, as has been suggested to us, that Aramark is attempting to cash in on the contract whilst they still have a chance?

On top of this, we should remember that prisoners are still earning wages based on rates that are the same as they were when the Incentives and Earned Privileges Scheme was introduced in 1995. Over that same period the RPI has increased by approx. 43%! How are they supposed to continue to afford to buy items from the prison shop under such circumstances? [Jan 2009]

If anyone has any information on the areas of the country where Aramark are still operating, we would be glad to hear from you.

BARBED TO CLOSE

The front page of the December 2008 issue of Inside Time carries the news that the Howard League for Penal Reform's Barbed project, the world's first social enterprise based inside a prison, is to close. An independent review carried by Professor Penny Green of King's College, London on behalf of the Howard League and released last month slates prison authorities:

“the prison authorities at Coldingley have, in reality, acted to disrupt and thwart its productive success. It took a whole year to get a telephone installed, apparently more through a toxic mixture of incompetence and risk aversion inside than any deliberate policy to obstruct. Arbitrary and unannounced withdrawal of prisoners from the Studio have repeatedly affected the business.”

Barbed currently employs six prisoners (11 in total have passed though it's doors since it began) on a starting salary at minimum wage levels of £8,880 per year for a 32 hour week, paying tax and N.I., and has more than 40 clients, including the Parole Board. But it is due to close at the end of December because changes in the core week, which has cut working hours down to 24 a week, make it financial unviable. This comes on top of the Prison Service coming to the belated decision that prisoners could not be employed by outside employers i.e. Barbed and therefore could not pay tax and N.I..

This appears to contradict both the Prison Service's own guidance on Tax and N.I. contained in PSO 4460 'Prisoners Pay' Section 2.8 - "Prisoners earning over the normal thresholds for Income Tax and National Insurance contributions are not exempted from these payments" - and also the government's policy of prison privatisation and the way in which Prison Industries' Contract Services functions. In the first, prisoners are effectively handed over lock stock and barrel to private companies to be employed for the companies' private profit in what ever way they see fit. In the second, prisoners are effectively employed in sub-contracted sweatshops for private companies in the same way as Nike and Primark employs Third World labour to produce their goods. Surely there is some form of contradiction here? Then again there are all those Category D prisoners across the UK who have day release jobs working for private companies. What about them? [Dec 2008]

IMMIGRATION DETAINEES EXPLOITED FOR CHEAP LABOUR

Detainees at the Campsfield House immigration prison in Oxfordshire are being "exploited for cheap labour" due to staff cuts, the Oxford and District Trades Union Council has revealed. The rejected asylum seekers, who are locked up for lengthy periods pending their deportation, are being paid £5 for six-hour shifts of cleaning and kitchen work.

A statement by the Oxford and District TUC said: "We maintain our position that Campsfield is a shameful operation and should be closed. As long as it is open, jobs should be properly paid and be done by trained staff. For detainees there should be adequate recreational, educational and other provision… Detainees should receive an adequate financial allowance and not be obliged to act as slave labour for a multinational that makes big profits out of an operation that causes detainees enormous stress, uncertainty, general misery and often mental illness."

Tracy Ellicott from the Campaign to Close Campsfield told Corporate Watch that detainees are not forced by GEO, the company that runs the prison, to work as such. They are, however, "forced in the sense that they are locked up for 24 hours a day, uncertain of their future and with no money to purchase any essentials they may need." She added detainees can apply to do certain 'jobs' in the centre, such as cleaning, kitchen work and in the library. But none of those she has been visiting was prepared to speak out about this as they are "too scared of retaliation." The shifts are 6 hours long and detainees are paid £5 per shift, or 83p an hour. A GEO guard has reportedly said that, according to Home Office rules, they could only pay detainees a maximum of £24 a week. Radio Oxford quoted a statement from the Home Office two weeks ago to the effect that this was all above board and had been agreed with the Home Secretary. A Border and Immigration Agency (BIA) spokesperson said: "All detained persons are provided with an opportunity and encouraged to participate in activities to meet their recreational and intellectual needs. Individuals are entitled to undertake paid activities at rates approved by the Secretary of State." As usual, GEO declined to comment. Since taking over the running of Campsfield in June 2006, Global Expertise in Outsourcing (GEO) has cut back on both staffing levels and educational, recreational and other provisions at the centre. Over the past year, GEO has sacked education workers, nursing staff have departed, staff turnover has increased, the welfare officer has left and in September, the chaplain was suspended. GEO’s main business is immigration detention centres and mental health centres throughout the world, especially in USA, UK, South Africa and Australia. It also runs a part of Guantánamo Bay base in Cuba. Private companies like GEO that run immigration detention centres make huge profits. Seven of the UK's ten detention centres are run by private companies. The average cost for detaining someone in 2007/08 was £119 per day. "It is unbelievable that people who have done nothing wrong are not only locked up in prison like criminals [sic], but are also being treated like slaves," Ms Ellicott said. "GEO is obviously saving money by using their 'captives' to perform menial tasks for slave wages." She added, "of course, they could save a lot more if these centres were closed altogether!". The Home Office admitted migrants imprisoned in detention centres are "exempt from the minimum wage" but claimed they are "not forced to work." A BIA spokesperson insisted: "This is voluntary and we are constantly looking for new opportunities to meet demand for this work." However, according to the immigration law, all asylum seekers are prohibited from work and live on state support, which is fixed at 70% of what is deemed to be the bare minimum to live on. The Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 states that "it is contrary to this section to employ an adult subject to immigration control if... he has not been granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom." The majority of those held in immigration detention centres are rejected asylum seekers (have not been granted leave to enter or remain in the UK) who are waiting to be deported back home. [from Corporate Watch's Latest News September 23, 2008]

We at CAPS of course know that non-immigration prisoners are also being treated like slaves.


Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5